Stagflation is not a state that happens usually because recession reduces demand for goods (because individuals have less funds to spend). Low demand generally leads to low inflation.
Inflation is a monetary phenomenom and we are, for the most component, avoiding it. But, if it were to kick up, a single way or one more, there is a identified path to fight it. On the other hand, what is additional essential in my thoughts, is how to break the acceleration of the decline in the top quality of life. The downward pressures of greater customer rates and restricted customer access to credit and extremely higher household debt loads aren’t going to waved away at the next turn of the small business cycle. The general welfare of individuals, for whom the economy exists, can’t be ignored. Calvin Coolidge believed that, history proved him wrong.
Concerning government spending the conclusions are much less clear-reduce. In general, on the other hand, these forms of government spending that are wasteful in the sense that the sources they employ could be better employed elsewhere—should be reduce. But there is no general case for cutting government expenditure merely on the expectation that to do so will straightaway lower the price of inflation. As a matter of fact some types of government spending specially those involving subsidy—may be at least as powerful in reducing expense-push inflation as are quite a few forms of tax reductions.
It seems, from looking at the history of the socialist United States, that some socialism (as you’ve defined it, public ownership of roads and such) is not a negative factor and is probably a great factor. Right after all, company would not function half as well with out the Post Workplace to carry invoices by means of the mail and the Interstate highways to carry raw materials and manufactured goods. And the US is the richest nation in the history of the world, even right after a lot more than 200 years of socialist policies.
No doubt the inflation of the 1970s created the macroeconomic status quo unattractive. But I do not believe the basic appeal of New Classical ideas lay in their better predictive capacity. The attraction of rational expectations was not that it explained actual expectations data greater than some form of adaptive scheme. As an alternative it just seemed much more consistent with the general thought of rationality that economists used all the time. Ricardian Equivalence was not prosperous simply because the data revealed that tax cuts had no influence on consumption – in reality study right after study have shown that tax cuts do have a significant influence on consumption.